Foucault - Discourse and Power/ Knowledge
Foucault’s ideas about discourse and power/knowledge help OSHC educators notice how language, labels, routines, and “common sense” expectations shape what we see, what we value, and how we respond to children. In this OSHC-ready module, you’ll learn the core concepts in plain language, hear a creative “voice of Foucault” narrative (educational purpose only), listen to educators plan how to apply the lens, hear an Educational Leader interview on mentoring reflective practice around language and power, work through a realistic case study, and complete a critical reflection using the Circle of Change (revised) so learning becomes visible in everyday practice.
Format
Online
Module
Author
Belinda Wright
Duration
45 - 60 Mins
Price
$49
About the module
In OSHC, we make dozens of quick decisions every day—about safety, behaviour, fairness, inclusion, and what “counts” as a good program. Foucault’s lens helps educators step back and ask a powerful set of questions:
Understand discourse + power/knowledge
A clear, practical introduction to the key ideas—how language creates “truths” about children and how power operates in everyday routines.
See it in practice + leadership
Bring the lens to life through a “voice of the theorist” narrative, educator implementation dialogue, a real case study, and an Educational Leader interview on mentoring teams to shift language and practice.
Reflect → improve
Use the Circle of Change (revised): Deconstruct → Confront → Theorise → Think Otherwise, then consolidate in “What have I learnt?” with one next step to trial.
How this module works
This module follows a consistent, educator-friendly structure:
-
Introduction to Foucault + what are discourse and power/knowledge?A plain-language overview with OSHC examples (labels, expectations, documentation, routines, “rules,” and behaviour narratives).
-
“Let’s hear from Michel Foucault”A short creative narrative where “Foucault” speaks to noticing how everyday language and systems shape practice (educational purpose only).
-
Educator dialogue: implementing the lensA realistic conversation between educators after completing the module—brainstorming how to:- check language and labels (e.g., “naughty,” “attention-seeking,” “non-compliant”)- shift from deficit stories to strength/need-based interpretations- adjust routines that unintentionally create conflict or exclusion- document in ways that support learning (not judgement)
-
Interview: Educational Leader perspectiveA grounded interview focused on:-how an Educational Leader coaches teams to reflect on language, assumptions, and “default” practices-how to handle tricky conversations without defensiveness-how to create shared expectations that support children’s dignity and belonging-what to do when documentation becomes punitive or overly surveillance-focused
-
OSHC case study: discourse in actionA realistic scenario where the same child’s behaviour is interpreted in different ways. Learners practise identifying the dominant “story,” noticing power dynamics (rules, space, adult positioning, group norms), and choosing responses that are fair, safe, and child-centred.
-
Critical reflection (Circle of Change – revised)Deconstruct → Confront → Theorise → Think Otherwise to challenge assumptions and re-design a more inclusive, respectful approach.
-
What have I learnt?A short consolidation step to name key takeaways and commit to one practical change to trial.
What educators will be able to do after this module
Educators who complete this module will be better able to:
- Notice how language shapes perceptions of children, behaviour, and “belonging”
- Reduce unhelpful labels and replace them with clearer, more respectful descriptions
- Identify routines/rules that create unnecessary power struggles—and redesign them
- Strengthen documentation so it supports learning, fairness, and professional decision-making
- Build a shared team approach to behaviour and inclusion that protects children’s dignity
- Mentor reflective conversations that lead to real practice change (not just “better wording”)
